|
FAQs
-
-
How
are members of the Council chosen?
-
What are
the considerations involved in a fishery management plan?
-
Who advises the
Council on developing fishery management plans?
-
What does a Fishery Management Plan do?
-
Where may one review a proposed Fishery Management Plan for the Gulf of Mexico?
-
May a fisherman on a vessel with a commercial Reef Fish permit retain the recreational bag limit of
a reef fish species when the commercial season or quota is closed?
-
May a recreational fisherman possess more than the daily bag limit if away from the dock for more
than one day?
-
May a commercial fisherman retain a bag limit of reef fish as well as the
allowed commercial quantity (applies when
there is a commercial trip limit such as for
red snapper or grouper)?
-
May a recreational fisherman possess both a federal and state bag limit of
reef fish?
-
How does the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) process work?
The steps involved in FMP development are as follows:
-
The Scoping Process -
Once the
Council identifies fisheries that should be managed, has coordinated input on
those species, as well as proposed management measures from scientists and the
public, a scoping document is developed. The scoping document outlines the
problem to be solved, presents possible management goals and measures, and
is published in the Federal Register for discussion at public hearings and
Council meetings.
-
The Draft FMP - Council
staff works with the Council, the various advisory committees, and NMFS
staff to draft the FMP and amendments. Each Council must follow ten
National Standards for drafting conservation and management measures:
-
prevent overfishing while
achieving optimum yield,
-
base recommendations on the best
scientific information available,
-
manage each stock (and
interrelated stocks) as a unit throughout its range,
-
refrain from discriminating
between residents of States and ensure that all allocations are fair and
equitable,
-
promote efficiency in the
utilization of fishery resources (but economic allocation cannot be the sole
purpose),
-
take into account variations in
and contingencies among fisheries,
-
minimize costs and avoid
unnecessary duplication,
-
take into account the importance
of fishery resources and economic impacts to fishing communities,
-
minimize bycatch and the
mortality of bycatch, and
-
promote the safety of human life
at sea.
The Secretary of Commerce issues
advisory guidelines based on the same National Standards to assist in the
development of FMPs. NMFS relies on the National Standard guidelines when
reviewing and considering for approval Council management recommendations.
-
The Environmental Assessment
(EA) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Phase - In the EA or EIS
phases of each draft FMP, the Council examines different management options,
conducts public hearings and solicits public comment, and settles on a
"preferred alternative." At the end of the comment period, the Council
reviews public comments and either approves the FMP, or starts over again
with a new suite of options or another set of hearings. NMFS provides
scientific advice and reviews the plans to make sure they meet legal
requirements.
-
Submission of the Draft FMP
to the Secretary of Commerce - Draft FMPs passing the EA and EIS Phase
are submitted to the Secretary of Commerce. The documents then go through
another process for soliciting public input. Proposed regulations are
published in the Federal Register with an opportunity for additional public
comment. The Secretary of Commerce then considers the final decision and
chooses whether to approve, disapprove, partially approve, or partially
disapprove the proposals. If FMPs are approved, the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register. NMFS implements the regulations and the
U.S. Coast Guard provides enforcement authority.
A flow chart
depicting the FMP process can be found
here.
12.
What is the
intercouncil boundary between the South Atlantic and the Gulf
of
Mexico?
|