Getting Involved in the Council Process

 




 

Why Get Involved?

Different people have different reasons for getting involved in the fisheries management process. Many groups are concerned about fisheries, including commercial fishermen, fishing families, recreational fishers, environmentalists, consumers, scientists, the tourism industry, and local communities. Whatever background or motivations, these groups share a common desire to ensure the health of fish populations and the marine ecosystems they depend on.

If you are a member of the commercial fishing community or if your business serves recreational fishers, the best reason to get involved is because the process affects your livelihood. You have no control over the weather, ocean conditions, or market prices, but becoming involved in the Council process gives you a voice in the decisions that affect your business.

Getting involved means commitment and hard work. It may mean reading documents, talking to people you don’t know, attending meetings, speaking in public, writing letters or e-mails, joining or forming an association, or joining an advisory panel or committee.


Ways to Get Involved

Many members of the fishing community and the public don’t have the time or resources to attend Council meetings. Fortunately, there are other ways to get without leaving home. Many of the suggestions below come from the publication Fish or Cut Bait, a guide to fisheries management written by anthropologists Bonnie McCay and Carolyn Creed (1999). You may also want to download a copy of Navigating the Council Process.

Learn

The first step to getting involved in the Council process is to learn about it. Learn how the Council system operates; learn the background of the problem in which you are interested. Learn how Council members see things, and why.  Learn what terms and acronyms like “CPUE” and “optimum yield” mean (see frequently used acronyms). Remember, knowledge is power. The more you know the greater your level of confidence and the more valuable your input. Some ways to learn:

 

Join a group

Groups are organized around different issues and interests. For example, environmental issues, fishing gear types, fisheries, communities, and other interests. There are also groups that cut across interests and gear types. Join a group that represents your interests. If you can’t find a group, create one. Joining a group will give you a greater voice, more motivation, and a larger pool of knowledge to draw from.

 

Make informed comments

Your comments will be most effective if they show that you know about the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the “National Standards” used to evaluate fishery management plans. Try to frame your comments and objections in these terms. Whether writing or testifying, make sure that your comments are relevant to whatever the Council is discussing at the moment. Know what stage of the process the Council is in. For example, are there important deadlines approaching? What political pressures are influencing this decision? See testimony example below.

 

Get to know someone

Getting to know someone is one of the best ways to make sure your voice is heard. Get to know your Council representative, other Council members, Committee members, and staff. 

 

Talk informally

One of the best ways to interact with the Council is simply to call a Council member or staff person. This type of contact provides a more personal way to discuss issues that concern or interest you. When calling, explain who you are, what your question or problem is, and ask for help in understanding what’s going on. Ask for a list of the committees and key council members responsible for your fishery, and ask whom you should call to get more background or advice. You can also speak at meetings and hearings, in the halls during meetings, or at the Council offices. Be sure to attend informal events associated with Council meetings. You may also want to speak with state agency staff and your state and federal representatives.

 

Attend a meeting

All regular Council meetings, committee meetings and advisory panel meetings are open to the public. Council meetings include a section for public testimony regarding issues on the agenda, as well as an open public comment section for those interested in speaking about general fishery issues. Council meetings and public hearings are held throughout the Gulf coast and public comment summaries are provided to Council members for review and consideration. For dates and the locations of upcoming meetings, click here.

 

Testify

Members of the commercial and recreational fishery, the environmental community, and the public are encouraged to testify at Council meetings and hearings. This involves speaking in a formal public forum. At Council meetings, the Council members and staff generally sit in a “U” formation and everyone else sits in chairs at one end of the room. You will have to walk up to a microphone to make your comments. Because of time constraints, public comment is limited to five minutes for individuals and ten minutes for representatives of groups.  If comments are supplied to the Council two weeks before the meeting date, they are included in the packet of information (called a Briefing Book) that is distributed to each Council member at least a week before the Council meeting.

It is best to be well prepared and as calm as possible when providing testimony. Read up on Council decisions related to your topic of interest and make sure that your comments are organized and relevant. Sign-up cards are provided at the entrance of the meeting room for people who wish to address the Council. For more tips, See testimony example below.

 

Write

The Council is very much interested in hearing your opinions and comments on current management issues. Council members read and consider all letters and emails that arrive prior the briefing book deadline, two weeks before a Council meeting.  Generally, letters are addressed to the Council Chair or the Executive Director. However, depending on the situation and the stage of the decision-making process, you may write letters or emails to a specific Council member, the Regional Director of NMFS, or others. See sample letter below.

Following is a list of tips for writing the Council.

  • Keep it short. When writing, a one page letter is best. If it's too long you run the risk that key points may be overlooked.
  • Stick to one subject. If you are writing concerning on a Plan Amendment that addresses a number of issues, it's okay to comment on all the issues in one letter. However, writing about separate issues, it’s best to write separate letters.
  • State your background at the beginning. Are you a recreational fishermen, commercial fisherman, marine scientist, etc.? If you are representing a group, tell us the name of the group and how large the membership is.
  • State your opinion. Then state why you have that opinion. Be explicit. Don’t leave the reader guessing your meaning.
  • Make sure your letter is legible. If the reader has to decipher handwriting, it will detract from the message. A typed or printed letter is best. You may also write letters to trade magazines such as the Florida Sportsman, which many managers read. Since the National Marine Fisheries Service reviews all Council decisions, it is also effective to write or call the Southeast Region of NMFS.

Serve

Interested citizens may serve on panels or committees. If you are interested in serving, talk to the Executive Director and the key staff person for the fishery in which you are interested.


Will I Make a Difference?

Your influence on Council decisions is relative to the amount of energy you put into being involved. Involvement can range from writing a letter to serving on an advisory panel. No matter what level of involvement you choose, your views will have more weight and influence if you learn about the context of the decisions being made, the timeline for the decision making process, and the best ways to communicate with Council members and advisory panel members.


Sample Letter

Dear Council Members:

I am a commercial jellyfish fisherman, and I represent the North Florida Jellyfish Harvesters Association, a group of 20 jellyfish fishermen in the Florida Panhandle. After having reviewed the draft Jellyfish Fishery Management Plan, the NFJHA is opposed to the proposed alternative for a daily trip limit on commercial jellyfish harvest.

The jellyfish fishery is a very small fishery, and it is having no discernable impact on the jellyfish resource at current harvest levels. This is a new and developing fishery. It's emergence as a stable industry will provide an alternative for fishermen who have been displaced from other fisheries or who are currently targeting other overfished and overcapitalized fisheries. But in order to evolve and to create a market for our product, this fishery needs time to develop without being hindered by unnecessary regulations. We recommend that no harvest limitations be enacted at this time, but that harvest levels be monitored on an ongoing basis. If at some future time a biological assessment shows that harvest is at or above maximum sustainable yield, then the appropriate measures to control harvest should be implemented at that time.

Sincerely,

John Doe
President, North Florida Jellyfish Harvesters Association


Sample Testimony

Testimony is limited to five minutes for individuals, or 10 minutes for group representatives. A yellow light means you are running out of time; a red light means you are out of time and should close your testimony.

 

This is the greeting traditionally used to address the Council. If the Chair is female, use "Madam Chair"

Mr. Chair and members of the Council,

State your name for the record.  If you represent an organization, be sure to say how many members it has.  

My name is John Doe.  I represent the North Florida Jellyfish Harvesters Association (NFJHA), a nonprofit organization with more than 8,000 members.

Refer to the fishery management plan or rule on which you are commenting.

We would like to express our concern that jellyfish are not being considered in the Council's proposed Sea Creature Fishery Management Plan.

State your desire clearly. Make sure you are asking for something that falls within the Council’s mandate.

We urge the Council to include consideration of jellyfish in the SCFMP.

Give some background about your expertise and experience

My father spent his life fishing for jellyfish, and from an early age I was impressed by these animals.  As a founder of NFJHA, I have made the study of jellyfish my life’s work.  In 1996 I conducted a comprehensive assessment of jellyfish in northern Florida for the National Jellyfish Association.

Don’t be afraid to show a little passion and poetry, but don’t go overboard. Control any anger you may feel. Connect the issue to other important issues facing the Council.

The assessment clearly shows that this mysterious and beautiful creature plays an important role in Florida's coastal ecosystem, particularly with regard to its symbiotic relationship with the horseshoe crab.

Provide supplemental information when relevant, but keep it brief. Be sure to send relevant material at least two weeks prior the Council meeting so it may be included in the briefing book.

Exhibit B.7 in your briefing book gives a brief summary of the assessment.

Provide a short history of your involvement with this issue. 

In May 2000, I sent a letter to the National Marine Fisheries Service on behalf of NFJHA expressing our concern that NMFS is ignoring the jellyfish fishery.

Demonstrate knowledge of other factors that are influencing the issue.    

The letter echoed many of the concerns presented in the lawsuit filed by the Jellyfish Supporters of South Texas (JSST. The decision in the JSST lawsuit is scheduled for November 2006 and is likely to bring jellyfish to the foreground of fisheries management issues.

Connect your concern to the National Standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.    

National Standard 2 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act states that “Conservation and management measures shall be based upon the best scientific information available.”  We at NFJHA strongly believe that the 2004 Jellyfish assessment represents the best scientific information available and should be considered in the SCFMP.

Re-state your argument at the end—with more detail, if desired. Suggest a constructive step for the Council to take.  Volunteer your services, if possible and relevant.

In closing, NFJHA respectfully requests that the Council immediately create a committee to consider including jellyfish in the FMP.  I am happy to serve on such a committee and make my knowledge of jellyfish available to the Council.

Close respectfully.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

 

Who to Contact

Contacting Council Members and Council staff is a good place to start.


Fisheries-Related Associations and Organizations